So, you’ve done all the fieldwork, all the
statistical analysis and your final manuscript has been completed… What’s left
is your scientific communication that goes beyond your journal article: The
scientific poster.
Scientists are notorious for creating poor
posters. Whether its overwhelming paragraphs of text or incomprehensible
graphics, scientists usually find a way to make a poster as unappealing as
possible. This is in direct contrast to the actual purpose of a poster, to
advertise the scientists’ research. A common mistake in poster creation is that
scientists try and summarise the information of their journal article into a
poster format. The poster is a completely different medium and the viewer
expects to digest it in a completely different way. Whereas the journal article
is information-orientated, the poster is a visual beast, with its primary
objective to grab the eye of a potential viewer, who can then dig into the
information once interest has set in.
As far as visual attraction goes, pictures are
essential. Pictures not only stand out across the visual landscape, pictures
also perform a wonderful job of putting scientific research into perspective,
or even conveying information without words. Pictures can also bring about an
emotional response in a viewer. Working on wetland pollutants? A picture of a
degraded river immediately tells the viewer what the problem is, and why your
research is important. Using the same principles, graphs can also become excellent
additions to your poster, but only if they are simple. The output of your research,
the results, can be displayed virtually word free in the form of a graph, but
overcomplicated graphs will only confuse viewers. Graphs with too many axes,
variables and too complicated keys should rather be left out. Graphs that stand
out, are intuitive and can be understood readily are ideal.
In most cases, your poster will be displayed at
conferences together with hundreds of others. The viewers your poster will be
presented to will have spent hours looking at hundreds of other posters, making
their cognitive skills a little less than sharp. This means that substantial
blocks of text will seem highly unappealing. Less is more. The relative weight
of each word on a poster far exceeds those in a journal article. Make your
point and make it unambiguously. As you need to capture the visual attention of
your viewer, the spacing of your text/images are something that needs to be
carefully considered. Try and understand where an audience will first let their
eyes fall and take advantage of these places. Make sure the title of your
poster is placed centrally, preferably near the top. The wording of your title
also needs to succinctly describe what your poster is about. Other visual cues
such as arrows or lines may also assist the viewer in understanding the flow
and narrative of your poster.
The poster is purely a visual medium, differing
from the journal article. Its of paramount importance to understand that even
if both works aspire to relay the same message, it needs to do so in different
ways.
Comments
Post a Comment